🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested millions of songs from the popular streaming service and is preparing to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Development

Observers said the apparent leak could boost AI companies looking for data to train their models.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and record names. The company, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not represent its entire catalog.

“We have located and disabled the malicious user accounts that were involved in illegal scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party collected public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM protections.

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

Spotify does not believe the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Naturally the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”.

AI Training and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be used for training AI models.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is sadly common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he said.

The Anna’s Archive site alludes to LibGen, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own private free equivalent of Spotify”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on modern music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between creatives, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Policy Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have protested against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder opts out. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has supported artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the matter, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has committed to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.